BASHIR AHMAD BHAT AND OTHERS v. ABDUL MAJEED TANCHA
CM(M)/424/2026 · 2026-09-19
Rajesh Sekhri
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3116 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3116 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 38 Supplementary Cause list IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(M) 424/2026
BASHIR AHMAD BHAT AND OTHERS(SENIOR CITIZEN) ….. Appellant/petitioner(s) Through: - Mr. Qazi Ayaz, Advocate
V/s
ABDUL MAJEED TANCHA
….. Respondent(s) Through: -
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
(ORDER) 19.09.2026
01. The short grievance projected by the petitioners is that they filed two applications in the Court of learned 4th Additional Munsiff, Srinagar [“the trial Court”]; one under Order XXXIX Rule 2(a) read with Section 151 CPC, on 15.04.2025, followed by supplementary application, under the same provisions, on 29.12.2025, but trial Court, till date, has failed to decide both the applications.
02.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he will be satisfied if trial Court is directed to dispose of aforesaid applications within a time frame. His statement is taken on record. Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
03. In view of limited nature of controversy and an innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, present petition is
disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to dispose of aforesaid applications preferred by the petitioners within a period of two months from the date copy of this order is made available.
04.
Disposed of along with connected CM(s).
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 19.09.2026
“Mohammad Yasin Dar”
Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document