Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3116 (AP)

M S VINAYABHUSHANA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/15555/2026 · 2026-06-17

Ninala Jayasurya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010263312026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 15555/2026 Between: 1. M S VINAYABHUSHANA RAO, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE, R/O FLAT NO.102, RAJAPATHIMITRA RESIDENCY, NEW COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN DISTRICT-532001. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SECRETARY TOTHE GOVERNMENT, LEGAL AND LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS JUSTICE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT- 532001. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAJKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 3. GP FOR LAW LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS NJS,J W.P No.15555 of 2026 2 The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.1, Mr. K N Krishna Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.2 and Mr. T Sanjeeva Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.3. 2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue placed a copy of the written instructions dated 15.06.2026 received from the respondent No.3, for perusal of this Court. 3. The grievance of the petitioner ventilated in the present writ petition is non-consideration of his representation dated 08.09.2025 submitted to the respondent No.3 with regard to Professional fee/Advocate fee for the services rendered as a Government Pleader for the Principal District Court, Srikakulam. 4. Considering the relief sought for in the writ petition, this Court, instead of keeping the same pending by inviting counter-affidavit, deems it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to the respondent No.3 to take appropriate action on the petitioner’s representation dated 08.09.2025, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. The respondent No.3 shall also give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before passing appropriate orders as directed above. 6. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:18.06.2026 Ksj