MARKET COMMITTEE, PATRAN v. AJMER SINGH AND OTHERS
LPA/1910/2026 · 2026-07-15
Amarinder Singh Grewal, Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31146 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31146 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
140
MARKET COMMITTEE, PATRAN, PUNJAB MANDI BOARD, TEHSIL PATRAN, AND ANOTHER
AJMER SINGH AND OTHERS
CORAM:
Present:
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral)
1.
25.05.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No.15331 of 2026.
2.
not be brought to the notice of the learned
judgment dated 25.05.2026 relationship hence been not pressed any further with liberty to the appellant to file a review petition before the learned Single Judge and further in case need arises, to file a fresh appeal.
3.
15-07-2026 Sapna Goyal NOTE:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
LPA-1910
Date of Decision :
MARKET COMMITTEE, PATRAN, PUNJAB MANDI BOARD, TEHSIL PATRAN, DISTRICT PATIALA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
VERSUS AJMER SINGH AND OTHERS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL
Mr. Nikhil Anand, Advocate for the appellants.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present appeal, challenge is to the judgment dated 25.05.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No.15331 of 2026.
Learned counsel for the appellant not be brought to the notice of the learned
judgment dated 25.05.2026 to contend that there was no master and servant relationship hence, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to the appellant to file a review before the learned Single Judge and further in case need arises, to file a fresh appeal. Ordered accordingly.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) 2026
(AMARINDER SINGH G NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned
Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1910-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.07.2026 MARKET COMMITTEE, PATRAN, PUNJAB MANDI BOARD, DISTRICT PATIALA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
........Appellants VERSUS
........Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Nikhil Anand, Advocate for the appellants.
In the present appeal, challenge is to the judgment dated 25.05.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No.15331 of 2026.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that all the facts could not be brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge while passing the to contend that there was no master and servant , the present appeal may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to the appellant to file a review before the learned Single Judge and further in case need arises, to file a (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE
AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE
/ reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO
MARKET COMMITTEE, PATRAN, PUNJAB MANDI BOARD, DISTRICT PATIALA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL In the present appeal, challenge is to the judgment dated
all the facts could Single Judge while passing the to contend that there was no master and servant , the present appeal may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to the appellant to file a review before the learned Single Judge and further in case need arises, to file a
) SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.18 14:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document