Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31146 (MAD)

Ms Mercedes Benz Financial Services India Pvt Ltd v. F Cleetus Rajan

Arb Appln/150/2026 · 2026-06-04

K Kumaresh Babu

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Arb Appln No. 150 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Arb Appln No. 150 of 2026 M/s Mercedes - Benz Financial Services India Pvt Ltd. (formerly known as M/s.Daimler Financial Services India Private Limited) 5th Floor, Plot 8, Baashyam Willow Square, 9 & 10, First Street, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-600032, Tamil Nadu, India. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. F.Cleetus Rajan S/o.Francis, No.26/48, Kalimal Colachel, Kalkulam, Kanyakumari, Tamil nadu 629 251. 2. Francis Edwisrajan So. Francis, No.26/48, Kalimal Colachel Kalkulam, Kanyakumari,Tamil Nadu 629 251 ..Respondent(s) Prayer : This application filed to pass an order directing the Respondents to furnish security to the tune of Rs.50,99,182.85/- failing which order attachment as 2nd charge holder of the property morefully described in the schedule hereunder, through District Court, Kanyakumari. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Arunachalam For Respondent(s): No appearance https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 150 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 3 O R D E R The instant application has been filed for directing the respondents to furnish security to the tune of Rs.50,99,182.85/- failing which order attachment as 2nd charge holder of the property morefully described in the schedule hereunder, through District Court, Kanyakumari, 2. By order dated 06.02.2026, this Court had directed the respondents to furnish the security while ordering notice to the respondents. The notices on the respondents have been returned with an endorsement as ‘unserved’ and the names have also been reflected in the cause-list. However, the private notice have been served and an affidavit of service has also been filed. In spite of which, the respondent is neither present in the Court nor represented by an Advocate and they have been called absent and have been set exparte. As the respondents had failed to respond by furnishing security and placed for any reasons as to why the they are not bound to furnish the security, there shall be an order of attachment as prayed for. 3. Registry is directed to communicate the order to concerned Sub-Regrar Office through the District Court Kanyakumari. 04-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Maya https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 150 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 3 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. Maya Arb Appln No. 150 of 2026 Dated : 04-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis