- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010542822017 NC: 2026:KHC:37973 RSA No. 1814 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1814 OF 2017 BETWEEN: SRI. LAKSHMANA MURTHY S/O LATE RAMAIAH R/AT JANGAMAKOTE VILLAGE AND HOBLI, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT PIN : 562105 …APPELLANT (BY SRI H.V.KRISHNAMURTHY FOR SRI H P LEELADHAR, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. MUNISHAMAPPA S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT K G CHIKKABALLA VILLAGE JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT PIN : 562105 RAMAKKA SINCE DEAD BY LRS 2. SMT RATHNAMMA W/O VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT JANGAMAKOTE VILLAGE AND HOBLI, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010542822017 NC: 2026:KHC:37973 RSA No. 1814 of 2017 PIN : 562105 3. SMT VASANTHAMMA W/O LATE CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT A. MEDIHALLA VILLAGE, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT PIN : 562106 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI ANJANEYA.A.B, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 AND R3 –SERVED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.07.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO.85/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDLAGHATTA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.4.2015 PASSED IN OS NO.101/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDLAGHATTA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Parties are present. They have presented a compromise petition under Order 23 Rule 3 r/w Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure signed by them and their respective Advocates. 2. Pursuant to the compromise, Rs.50,000/- is tendered in cash by the respondent to the appellant, same is acknowledged. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010542822017 NC: 2026:KHC:37973 RSA No. 1814 of 2017 3. Parties agreed that the contents of the compromise petition depicts true terms of settlement and there is no force, undue influence or coercion in reaching out the terms of the settlement. 4. Accordingly, there is no impediment for this Court to accept the compromise petition and dispose of the appeal in terms of the compromise petition. 5. Accordingly, the following: ORDER (i) Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. (ii) Office is directed to pass modified decree in terms of the compromise petition appending the copy of the compromise petition as part of the decree. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 80