Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3114 (JHR)

SANJIT KUIRI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2828/2026 · 2026-04-08

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:10018 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2828 of 2026 ------ Sanjit Kuiri, aged about 30 years, son of Ghanshyam Kuiri, resident of Purulia Road, Baram, Upper Toli, P.O.-Mahilong, P.S.-Namkum, District-Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. P.S. Dayal, Advocate For the State : Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 08-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Tatisilwai P.S. Case No.18 of 2025 (N) (S) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 21(c) & 22(b) of the NDPS Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that from the co-accused Shahbaz Khan 75 bottles of 100ml each of Onerex Cough Syrup and 144 Winspasmo Forte Capsules was recovered and the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was using the mobile phone belonging to the co- accused person. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that nothing has been recovered from the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-09 of this bail application. It is next submitted that the co-accused person has been granted bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 20.08.2025 in B.A. No.4044 of 2025. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 29.01.2026. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, NDPS, Ranchi in connection with Tatisilwai P.S. Case No.18 of 2025 (N) (S) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 08/04/2026 Abhiraj/