Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31134 (PAT)

Deepak Sahani v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./5060/2026 · 2026-01-30

Satyavrat Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5060 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2023 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Deepak Sahani Upendra Sahani R/O Village- Jhakhiya, P.S- Banjariya, District- East Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 30-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 34 of the IPC & Sections 30(a), 32, 34, 36, 41(1), 44 and 45 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 290 litres of liquor from a place near bank of a river along with 8000 litres of raw material which was destroyed at the spot. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to villagers at Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5060 of 2026(2) dt.30-01-2026 2/2 large and he came to be implicated at the instance of chowkidar but then it is submitted that if chowkidar was aware of the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence then why he did not inform the police prior to institution of the instant FIR which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution. It is next submitted that petitioner is in custody since 20.11.2025. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Turkauliya (Banjariya) P.S. Case No.62/2023. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T