1 APHC010299672026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 15588/2026 Between: 1. MULAPARTI MANGARAJU, S/O CHINNA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1-48, MADIGAPETA, PEERA RAMACHANDRAPURAM, ANAPARTHI EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 533342. 2. KARRI SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS M/S. ANUSRI CASHEWS, R.S. NO. 74/2/A2, BHUPALAPATNAM, RAJANAGRAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 533101. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. BANK OF BARODA, RAJAHMUNDRY BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, P.B. NO. 4, 31-140, AJANTHA BUILDING, FORT GATE, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 533101. 2. CNX CORPORATION LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, 12-A, HAJI KASAM BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR, 66, TAMRIND LANE, FORT, MUMBAI-400001 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the order 2 dated 18.05.2026 in I.A. No. 1197 of 2026 in O.A. No. 288 of 2020, on the file of Honble Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, as illegal, unconstitutional, and in clear violation of the Principles of Natural Justice, inasmuch as the Petitioners were denied their right to cross-examine the Chief Manager/PW-1 of the Respondent Bank and consequently setaside the order dated 18.05.2026 in I.A. No. 1197 of 2026 in O.A. No. 288 of 2020, on the file of Honble Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, by permitting the Petitioners to cross-examine the Chief Manager/PW-1, and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased grant stay of all further proceedings in O.A. No. 288 of 2020 on the file of the Honble Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V ROOPESH KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO. 15588 of 2026 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Hari Haranadha Sarma) When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdrawn this Writ Petition with a liberty to pursue their remedies before Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal. 2. Permission is granted. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND __________________________________ JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA Dated: 18.06.2026 TM 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 15588/2026 Dated: 18.06.2026 TM