Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31128 (MAD)

A.Maheswari v. The Registrar General

WP/18190/2026 · 2026-06-01

N Senthilkumar, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:MHC:1959 WP No. 18190 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR WP No. 18190 of 2026 A.Maheswari ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Registrar General, High Court of Madras, Chennai-104 2. The Chief Judicial Magistrate Tiruppur, Tiruppur District ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India issuing writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the 2nd respondent in Proceedings No.34/2026 dated 30.03.2026 and quash the same and direct the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with all attendant benefits. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Rajendran For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Ebenezer Paul for R1 & R2 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The present writ petition has been instituted challenging the order of suspension dated 30.03.2026. 2. Petitioner is holding the post of Head Clerk at Chief Judicial Magistrate Court at Tirupur. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:1959 WP No. 18190 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that regarding the allegation of insubordination, charge memo has already been issued vide proceedings dated 17.04.2026. It is not disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent. Even as per the written instruction given by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirupur, charge memo has already been already issued to the delinquent officer. Petitioner has already submitted her explanation to the charge memo. 4. In view of the said factum, respondents are directed to proceed with the departmental disciplinary proceedings by following the procedure as contemplated under the Discipline and Appeal Rules and conclude the same as expeditiously as possible. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (N.S.,J.) 01-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GD To 1. The Registrar General, High Court of Madras, Chennai-104 2. The Chief Judicial Magistrate Tiruppur, Tiruppur District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:1959 WP No. 18190 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 3 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND N.SENTHILKUMAR, J. GD WP No. 18190 of 2026 01-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis