Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31123 (MAD)

JOTHI v. The District Collector

WP/17841/2026 · 2026-06-01

Mohammed Shaffiq

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 17841 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ WP No. 17841 of 2026 Jothi W/o Pandiyarajan No 3/23, Perumal Kovil street, Sendrapakkam, Vilangadupakkam Post, Sengundram, Chennai ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Collectorate office, Tiruvallur District 2. The Tahsildar Ponneri Taluk, Tiruvallur District ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to issue a correct death certificate of the petitioner’s mother namely Sevanammal, wife of pandi instead of Sevenammal, wife of Selvakumar in registration No D-2019-33- 10680-000025 based on the representation dated 24.01.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Kalimuthu For Respondent(s): Mr.Elayaraj kumar Government Advcoate https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 17841 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to issue a correct death certificate of the petitioner’s mother namely Sevanammal, wife of Pandi instead of Sevenammal, wife of Selvakumar in registration No D-2019-33-10680- 000025 based on the representation dated 24.01.2026. 2. Heard Mr.Elayaraj Kumar, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents. In view of the consent expressed by the learned counsel on either side, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 3. At the outset, learned Government Advocate for respondents would submit that the petitioner's representation dated 09.01.2026 would be considered by appropriate authority in accordance with law, within a time period to be fixed by this Court. 4. In view of the above, taking into consideration the limited relief sought for in this Writ Petition, there shall be a direction to second respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 09.01.2026, on its own merits, keeping in view the recommendations dated 24.01.2026 and 27.01.2026 made by the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 17841 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 Village Administrative Officer and the Revenue Inspector and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to petitioner and any other interested persons, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any views with regard to the merits of the representation and it is open to the concerned respondent to consider the representation on its own merits and in accordance with law. 5. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 01-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ANU To 1. The District Collector Collectorate office, Tiruvallur District 2. The Tahsildar Ponneri Taluk, Tiruvallur District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 17841 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. ANU WP No. 17841 of 2026 01-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis