Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3111 (ORI)

KEDARNATH PUROHIT v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/1552/2026 · 2026-01-19

Sashikanta Mishra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.1552 of 2026 CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER 19.01.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. The petitioner’s grievance is that his application for mutation submitted on 14.11.2024 has not been accepted so far. 3. Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner should apply online as per the prevailing practice. 4. In such view of the matter, the writ application is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to apply for mutation afresh through online mode. It goes without saying that if such application is submitted the same shall be considered in accordance with law. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Puspanjali Kedarnath Purohit .… Petitioner Represented by Mrs. S. Dash, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & Others .… Opp. Parties Represented by Mr. S.N. Patnaik, Additional Government Advocate Order No. 01. . Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack.