20/03/2026 D/L – 4 Court No.6 S. Kundu Rejected IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CRM (A) 170 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Sahebganj P.S case no. 257 of 2023 dated 7/7/2023 under sections 448/323/325/326/307/34 of the BNS. In the matter of: Dipak Roy & Ors. ...Petitioners. Mr. H.S. Podder …for the petitioners. Mr. A.S. Chakraborty Mr. Dhiman Sil …for the State. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The case has a political overtone. 2. Learned APP representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He relies on the injury reports which, inter alia, show gunshot injury/bullet injury. He also relies on the statements of witnesses including that of the victim where the names of the petitioners were taken. 3. Considering the above and the other incriminating materials available in the case diary, I do not consider this to be a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. 2 4. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Jay Sengupta, J.)