Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31109 (PNJ)

BHUPINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/8466/2026 · 2026-07-17

Surya Partap Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-8466 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 126 BHUPINDER SINGH STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA P directions to as his family members from the respondents No.4 to 6. 2. petitioner has filed the before the respondent No. present petition by issuing directions to the abovementioned representation within 3. 8466-2026 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH BHUPINDER SINGH VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PA Mr. Vivek K. Thakur, Advocate for SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the directions to the respondents No.1 to 3 to as his family members from the respondents No.4 to 6. The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed the representation dated the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for disposing of the present petition by issuing directions to the abovementioned representation within the Notice of motion to respondents No.1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8466-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 17.07.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioner. as been filed by the petitioner to protect his life and liberty as well as his family members from the respondents No.4 to 6. The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the dated 09.07.2026 (Annexure P . The learned counsel prays for disposing of the present petition by issuing directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the the stipulated time. to respondents No.1 to 3 only. (O&M) .07.2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS for protect his life and liberty as well The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the (Annexure P-6) . The learned counsel prays for disposing of the to decide the GAURAV THAKUR 2026.07.17 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8466 on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3/State. State is hereby dispensed with. 5. hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioner (Annexure P Punjab, Chandigarh other police officer not below the rank of is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner level. 6. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 8466-2026 (O&M) 8587 Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3/State. is hereby dispensed with. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioner (Annexure P-6) be disposed of either by the Chandigarh (respondent No.2) or other police officer not below the rank of is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own In view of above, the present petition Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab appears on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3/State. Hence service of notice upon the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioner ) be disposed of either by the Director General of Police (respondent No.2) or, on assignment by him, by any other police officer not below the rank of Senior Superintendent of Police is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of an independent decision at his own In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of. :Yes/No : Yes/No appears upon the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioner Police any Senior Superintendent of Police. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of an independent decision at his own GAURAV THAKUR 2026.07.17 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document