2026:JHHC:9910 --1-- A.B.A. No. 1144 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1144 of 2026 ---- Aashish Mirdha, aged about 17 years, son of Patwari Mirdha, represented through his Natural Guardian being his father named Patwari Mirdha, R/o village – Gokulpur, PO and PS – Malda House, District – Pakur, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Atul Rai, Advocate :- Mr. Praveen Chandra, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, Advocate ---- 02/07.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pakur Town P.S. Case No.296 of 2025 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 75(2), 351(2) and 352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned C.J.M., Pakur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that false allegation is made against the petitioner of teasing and assaulting the informant. He further submits that even the interpolation has been made in the bottom part of the hand written FIR, however, in the typed copy of the FIR which is in the Form the said part is missing. He then submits that the informant is aged about 19 years whereas this petitioner is aged about 17 years and 2026:JHHC:9910 --2-- A.B.A. No. 1144 of 2026 to buttress this argument he refers to provisional certificate of Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi contained in Annexure-2. He next submits that informant was going on in motorcycle along with her sister and met with an accident and pursuant to that sister of this informant has died and injury has been received by the informant. He also submits that injury has been disclosed in the case diary, however that injury has occurred due to aforesaid accident and color has been given that due to assault made by the petitioner that has occurred. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that allegations are there of assault and injury has been received by the informant. 5. Considering that the petitioner is minor aged about 17 years whereas victim is aged about 19 years and in the hand written FIR there is insertion of one line at the bottom part of the FIR wherein in the type copy of the FIR in the Form that is missing. It has been pointed out that the injury has been received by the informant due to road accident in which her sister has left for heavenly abode and in that view of the matter the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 07.04.2026 Sangam/