Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 311 (ALL)

DHARMI DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/8034/2026 · 2026-02-25

Prakash Padia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 8034 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the respondent/respondents to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the respondent/respondents feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The basic relief sought by the petitioners in the present petition is to direct the respondent no.2-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil-Nizamabad, District Azamgarh to decide the appeal No.T202515060210774 of 2025 expeditiously. 4. It is argued by counsel for the petitioners that though a considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter. 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the court concerned to decide the aforesaid appeal strictly in accordance with law most expeditiously and preferably within a period of four months but without granting unnecessary adjournment unless there is no legal impediment. February 26, 2026 Pramod Tripathi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prakash Padia,J.) Dharmi Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad