Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31095 (PNJ)

RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

LPA/1150/2026 · 2026-07-15

Amarinder Singh Grewal, Harsimran Singh Sethi

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (137) LPA No. 1150 of 2026 Date of Decision : 15.07.2026 HC Raj Kumar and others ...Appellants Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Ms. Shruti Jain Goyal, Advocate for the appellants. *** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the appellants, at the outset, submits that the appellants intend to file a review petition before the learned Single Judge on various grounds hence, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed with liberty that in case, the appellants are not successful in filing the review, they can file a fresh appeal. 2. Ordered accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) July 15, 2026 JUDGE kanchan Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No KANCHAN 2026.07.17 09:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment