Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31073 (PAT)

Ganesh Pandit v. Sudama Devi

C.Misc./72/2023 · 2026-02-02

S B P Singh

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.72 of 2023 ====================================================== 1. Ganesh Pandit Son of Late Sarjug Pandit. Resident of Village- Basantpur Patti, P.S. and Anchal- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. 2. Mahesh Pandit Son of Late Sarjug Pandit. Resident of Village- Basantpur Patti, P.S. and Anchal- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. 3. Rameshwar Pandit Son of Harendra Pandit Resident of Village- Basantpur Patti, P.S. and Anchal- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. 4. Rajeshwar Pandit @ Rajeshwar Kumar Son of Harendra Pandit. Resident of Village- Basantpur Patti, P.S. and Anchal- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. 5. Most. Banarshi Devi Wife of Harendra Pandit Resident of Village- Basantpur Patti, P.S. and Anchal- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Sudama Devi Wife of Lakshaman Pandit resident of Village and P.O.- Banjariya, P.S. and Anchal- Motipur, Munsifi and Sub Division West- Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur. 2. Shushila Devi Wife of Satyanarayan Pandit Resident of Village and P.O.- Amaitha, Munsifi and P.S. and Anchal- Saraiya, Munsifi and Sub Division- West Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Alka Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 6 30-10-2024 On call none appears for the petitioners. 2. Perusal of record shows that even on the last date of hearing none appears for the petitioners. 3. It seems the petitioners have lost interest in their case. 4. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. anuradha/- (Arun Kumar Jha, J) U