Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31071 (PNJ)

NEERAJ ALIAS SAPOLA v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/4696/2026 · 2026-07-15

Sanjay Vashisth

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-4696-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.218 CRM-M-4696-2026 Decided on : 15.07.2026 Neeraj @ Sapola ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH *** Present : Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pawan Kumar Garg, DAG, Haryana. *** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner Neeraj @ Sapola has filed the instant petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.0055 dated 22.03.2025, registered under Sections 115/117(2)/190/191(3)/304/351(3) of the BNS, 2023 (Sections 190/191(3) of the BNS, 2023 deleted lateron and Sections 115(2)/238/118(2) of the BNS, 2023 added lateron), at Police Station Old Faridabad, District Faridabad. 2. The petitioner in the present case was arrested on 24.04.2025. Thus, he is inside jail for the last 01 year 02 months and 20 days. He is alleged to be the main accused who had stanched Rs.16,000/- from victim Bhola and also gave injury on his head with danda. Even the injured- complainant could not be examined till date. The petitioner is facing 18 other criminal cases against him. MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.07.17 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-4696-2026 2 3. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition at this stage. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage. (SANJAY VASHISTH) 15.07.2026 JUDGE mamta Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.07.17 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh