Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31067 (PNJ)

UMA SHARMA THROUGH GPA v. HARYANA VIKAS PRADHIKARAN NIGAM

CWP/21173/2026 · 2026-07-15

Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-21173-2026 [1] 138 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21173-2026 Date of decision: 15.07.2026 Uma Sharma ...Petitioner Versus Haryana Vikas Pradhikaran Nigam ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Adarsh Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Lakshya Aggarwal, Advocate and Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate and Ms. Kamaldeep Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to carry out necessary transfer of ownership of plot No.1264, Sector 23/23A, Urban Estate Gurugram, sold by previous owner Smt. Savitri Devi in favour of the petitioner. 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had purchased plot No.1264, Sector 23/23A, Urban Estate Gurugram measuring 135 square meters from Savitri Devi. It is further submitted that conveyance deed was registered in favour of said Savitri Devi on 05.11.2001 and the sale deed in favour of the petitioner was registered on 13.06.2005 in the office of Sub Registrar, Gurugram and the permission to transfer the property was given by the HSVP vide Memo No.5255 dated 29.04.2005. It is PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.17 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-21173-2026 [2] submitted that however, till date, the re-allotment letter has not been issued in favour of the petitioner. It is submitted that for the redressal of her grievance, the petitioner has already given several representations including legal notice dated 17.12.2019 (Annexure P-14). It is further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied in case Estate Officer-I, HSVP, Gurugram is directed to decide the same in a time bound manner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the said legal notice dated 17.12.2019 would be considered and decided by the Estate Officer-I, HSVP, Gurugram, within a period of three months from today and in case the pleas of the petitioner are found to be meritorious then necessary relief would also be granted to the petitioner. 4. Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to the Estate Officer-I, HSVP, Gurugram to consider and decide legal notice dated 17.12.2019 by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from today. In case, Estate Officer-I, HSVP, Gurugram finds that the pleas raised by the petitioner are meritorious then necessary relief would also be granted to the petitioner expeditiously. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 15.07.2026 Pawan Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.17 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document