GAHC010020072026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/552/2026 SIDDHARTHA MODAK SON OF RAJAN KISHAN MODAK, RESIDENT OF MADAN DIGIRPAR BILPAR, SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM- 788001. VERSUS SMALL BUSINESS FINECREDIT INDIA PVT. LTD. UNIT NO 103, 1ST FLOOR, C AND B SQUARE, SANGRAM COMPLEX, CTC NO. 95A, 127 ANDHERI KURLA ROAD, VILLAGE- CHAKALA ANDHERI (EAST) MUMBARI- 400059. For the petitioner(s)/ : Dr. Puja Agarwal, Advocate appellant(s) For the respondent(s) : – BEFORE – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY 12.02.2026 (Ashutosh Kumar, C.J.) Though notice has been attempted to be served dasti on the respondent, but it appears that the respondent has refused to accept the same. In that view of the matter, the notice would be deemed to have been served. We close this writ petition only with a direction that no precipitate action shall be taken against the petitioner till 05.03.2026, whereafter the respondent(s) would be at liberty to proceed in the matter in accordance with law. Writ petition stands disposed off. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant