Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3106 (CHH)

LAXMIKANT PATEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1466/2026 · 2026-02-08

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:6992 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1466 of 2026 1 - Laxmikant Patel S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Patel Aged About 56 Years Working As Head Master At Govt. Primary School, Kalmi Block And Tahsil- Raigarh, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Vikas Kumar Tiwari S/o Late Ajay Kumar Tiwari Aged About 52 Years Working As Head Master At Govt. Primary School, Pandripani Block And Tahsil- Raigarh, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 3 - Manisha Kindo W/o Shresthvat Kindo Aged About 48 Years Working As Head Master At Govt. Primary School, Kotarliya Block And Tahsil- Raigarh, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Public Instructions Directorate Indravati Bhawan, Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Joint Director Education Division, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 5 - The District Education Officer Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 6 - The Block Education Officer Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakhar Dashore, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Government Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 09/02/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking for following reliefs:- “10.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ and call for the entire records form the competent authorities pertaining to the s for kind perusal of the Hon'ble High Court in the interest of justice. 10.2 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to decide the representation dated 03.07.2025 (Annexure P/1), in the interest of justice. 10.3 This Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to pass an appropriate order or issue writ as deemed fit under the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted their representation before the Respondent No.5 against the grievances raised in this writ petition which is still pending consideration, therefore, direction may be issued to the Respondent No.5 to take decision on the representation at the earliest. 3. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioners are not pressing this petition on merits and are only seeking a direction to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioners, at this stage, she is having no objection to the limited prayer. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record. 5. On due consideration the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is disposed of directing the Respondent No.5 to take decision on pending representation of the petitioners (Annexure P/1) dated 03.07.2025 in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observation and direction. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Saxena