106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRWP-6721-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.07.2026 SHRIMATI …Petitioner V/S UT OF CHANDIGARH AND ORS …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Siddarth, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satish Kumar, A.P.P. U.T. Chandigarh for respondents No.1 to 3. **** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J. (Oral) The criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks a direction to official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of private respondents No.4 and 5. Learned State counsel submits that the matter had been compromised between petitioner and private respondents, who are her son and daughter-in-law. The factual position is not disputed by learned counsel for petitioner. The petition accordingly stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) 17.07.2026 JUDGE Sumit Singla Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AJAY GOSWAMI 2026.07.17 19:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document