Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31049 (KAR)

SMT. PUNEETHA @ PUNEETHA B A v. SRI D RAVI

RPFC/198/2025 · 2026-07-22

P Sree Sudha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010462492025 NC: 2026:KHC:38351 RPFC No. 198 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 198 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PUNEETHA @ PUNEETHA B A W/O.SRI.RAVI.D D/O.SRI.APPAJACHAR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 2. MASTER KUSHALESH.R S/O.SRI.RAVI.D AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT. PUNEETHA.B.A BOTH ARE PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.51, S.L.V.NILAYA 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN GOVINDA REDDY LAYOUT NEAR ARAKERE, MICO LAYOUT BANNERGHATTA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560076. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHAN S.,ADVOCATE) AND: SRI D RAVI S/O.LATE SRI.N.G.DAYANAND Digitally signed by PADMASHREE SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010462492025 NC: 2026:KHC:38351 RPFC No. 198 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.276, 6TH MAIN ROAD, ARAKERE, MICO LAYOUT BANNERGHATTA MAIN ROAD BENGALURU-560076. RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K KRISHNA.,ADVOCATE) THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 02.05.2025 PASSED IN Crl.MISC NO.312/2014 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING PETITION FILED UNDER SEC. 125 OF Cr.P.C FOR MAINTENANCE AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL ORDER Both the parties are present, they are identified by their respective learned counsel and they have filed a memorandum of settlement. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010462492025 NC: 2026:KHC:38351 RPFC No. 198 of 2025 2. Therefore, this Court finds it just and reasonable to dispose of the matter in terms of the memorandum of settlement entered into between both the parties. 3. In terms of the memorandum of settlement, the petition is disposed of. In view of disposal of the main petition pending interlocutory application does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, disposed of. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE PNV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2