Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010277532025 2026:GAU-AS:605 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7289/2025 SMTI ELIZA BRAHMA DAUGHTER OF LATE NILOMONI BRAHMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NORTH DOTMA, POST OFFICE-DOTMA, POLICE STATION-DOTMA, DISTRICT-- KOKRAJHAR, BTR, ASSAM ,PIN-783347 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 781006. 2:THE DIRECTOR SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT ASSAM UZAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 3:BODOLAND TERRITORIAL REGION REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM 4:DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER KOKRAJHAR DISTRICT- KOKRAJHAR BTR ASSAM. 5:THE SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR APPOINTMENT OF ANGAWADI WORKER Page No.# 2/3 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER KOKRAJHAR DISTRICT-KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM. 6:THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER DOTMA INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE ICDS PROJECT DOTMA DISTRICT-KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM. 7:SMTI MIJINK BRAHMA WIFE OF CHANDRAJEET ROY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-NORTH DOTMA POST OFFICE-DOTMA POLICE STATION- DOTMA DISTRICT- - KOKRAJHAR BTR ASSAM PIN-78334 For the Petitioner(s) : Mrs. R.S. Deuri, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Dhar, Govt. Advocate Mr. N.R. Sharma, Standing Counsel BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 20.01.2026 Pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 05.01.2026, Mr. N.R. Sharma, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 3 to 6 has produced before this Court a copy of the Office Order dated 24.04.2025 whereby the respondent No. 7 was appointed as Anganwadi Page No.# 3/3 Worker/Anganwadi Helper to N/Dotma, AWC No. 58. The copy of the said order is kept on record and marked with the letter “X”. 2. A copy of the said Office Order which is kept on record and marked with the letter “X” be handed over to Mrs. R.S. Deuri, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner during the course of the day. 3. Mrs. R.S. Deuri, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be well advised to withdraw the instant writ petition with a liberty to re- file challenging the Office Order dated 24.04.2025. 4. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition therefore stands closed on withdrawal. 5. Liberty, however, is given to the petitioner to re-file challenging the order dated 24.04.2025. JUDGE Comparing Assistant