IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 268 M/S MANCHANDA AUTOS M/S TVS CREDIT SERVICES LIMITED CORAM: Present: TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA quashing the Additional District Judge, S.A.S. Nagar, in EXE petitioner’s application 10.04.2026, Annexure P sale of the attached property/house adjourned. 2. is now listed for hearing before the learned Additional District Judge on 19.08.2026, and the order dated 10.04.2026 is not stayed, grave prejudice will be caused to her as the house IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M/S MANCHANDA AUTOS Versus M/S TVS CREDIT SERVICES LIMITED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. J.S. Jaidka, Advocate and Ms. Garima Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia quashing the order dated 29.05.2026, Annexure P Additional District Judge, S.A.S. Nagar, in EXE petitioner’s applications seeking recalling and stay of the order dated 10.04.2026, Annexure P-6, passed under Order 21 Rule 66 CPC allowing sale of the attached property/house through public auction Learned counsel for the petitioner is now listed for hearing before the learned Additional District Judge on 19.08.2026, and she needs to be protected against sale of the house. the order dated 10.04.2026 is not stayed, grave prejudice will be caused to house in question might be put on sale in the meanwhile. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18887-2026 Date of decision: July 15, 2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA inter alia seeking a writ of certiorari order dated 29.05.2026, Annexure P-11, passed by learned Additional District Judge, S.A.S. Nagar, in EXE-706-2025, whereby the seeking recalling and stay of the order dated 6, passed under Order 21 Rule 66 CPC allowing through public auction, have been oner contends that the application is now listed for hearing before the learned Additional District Judge on ected against sale of the house. In case the order dated 10.04.2026 is not stayed, grave prejudice will be caused to might be put on sale in the meanwhile. Date of decision: July 15, 2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent certiorari learned 2025, whereby the seeking recalling and stay of the order dated 6, passed under Order 21 Rule 66 CPC allowing , have been that the application is now listed for hearing before the learned Additional District Judge on n case the order dated 10.04.2026 is not stayed, grave prejudice will be caused to JASPREET KAUR 2026.07.17 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP-18887-2026 -2- 3. Learned counsel for the respondent contends that only on account of the instant petition being pending before this Court, the said applications are not being decided finally, despite the pleadings being complete. 4. In this view of the matter, the petition is disposed of directing learned Additional District Judge to hear and decide the aforementioned application for stay of the order dated 10.04.2026, on the next date of hearing in accordance with law. Till the decision is taken, the order dated 10.04.2026 shall remain in abeyance. July 15, 2026 (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) Jaspreet Kaur JUDGE  Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JASPREET KAUR 2026.07.17 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh