Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31025 (CHH)

SHRI RANVEER @ GOPI @ SIKKY SONI v. SMT. KHUSHBOO SONI

CRR/436/2025 · 2026-08-04

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010113642025 2026:CGHC:34269 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 436 of 2025 Shri Ranveer @ Gopi @ Sikky Soni S/o Shri Omprakash Soni Aged About 35 Years R/o Near D.P. College, Murgi Gali, Tikrapara, P.S. - City Kotwali, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Applicant versus 1. Smt. Khushboo Soni W/o Shri Ranveer @ Gopi @ Sikky Soni Aged About 31 Years R/o Devnagri, Shiv Vihar Colony, Mahadev Ghat, Raipura, P.S. - D.D. Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil And District - Raipur (C.G.) 2. Ku. Princy Soni D/o Shri Ranveer @ Gopi @ Sikky Soni Aged About 4 Years Through Guardian Smt. Khushboo Soni W/o Shri Ranveer @ Gopi @ Sikky Soni, R/o Devnagri, Shiv Vihar Colony, Mahadev Ghat, Raipura, P.S. - D.D. Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil And District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Applicant : Ms. Isha Jajodia, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. S.P. Sannat, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 05.08.2026 1. Heard Ms. Isha Jajodia, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S.P. Sannat, learned counsel, appearing for the respondents. ABHISHEK SHRIVAS Digitally signed by ABHISHEK SHRIVAS Date: 2026.08.06 12:15:38 +0530 2 2. This criminal revision has been =led by the applicant with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to allow this revision and set aside the impugned order dated 13/11/2024 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur (C.G.) in Criminal MCC No.1149/2023 and in e.ect give opportunity of hearing to the applicant dismiss the application /led by the Non- Applicant no.1 herein under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. for grant of interim maintenance in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the parties have already obtained a decree of divorce by mutual consent. Therefore, she seeks permission to withdraw the present revision petition. 4. In view of the above submission, this revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn without further liberty. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Abhishek