- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010351622024 NC: 2026:KHC:37381 RSA No. 999 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.999 OF 2024 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. YASHODAMMA W/O. LATE VENKATARAVANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 2. SRINIVASA. H. V. S/O LATE VENKATARAVANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 3. SHANTHAKUMARI. H. V. D/O LATE VENKATARAVANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 4. MADHUSUDHANA H. V. S/O. LATE VENKATARAVANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, 5. THIMMAIAH S/O. LATE MUDLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 6. JAYARAM S/O. LATE MUDLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF HONASIGERE, HONASIGERE POST, HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK -572 120. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. A.N.KULKARNI FOR SRI VIVEK HOLLA, ADVOCATES) Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010351622024 NC: 2026:KHC:37381 RSA No. 999 of 2024 AND: 1. T S SRIKANTAIAH S/O. LATE SIDDARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 2. S. RUDRESH S/O. T. S. SRIKANTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF HONASIGERE, HONASIGERE POST, HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK-572 120. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.R.RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2 AND R1) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.03.2024 PASSED IN R.A.NO.20/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TUMAKURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.01.2022 PASSED IN O.S.NO.1020/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TUMAKURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010351622024 NC: 2026:KHC:37381 RSA No. 999 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT On behalf of respondents, S. Rudresh who is the second respondent is present before the Court and he has made a video call wherein, first respondent is seen sitting in the car in the precincts of the Court. On behalf of the appellants, appellant No.2 – Srinivasa H.V., who is also power of attorney holder of all the appellants is present. 2. They present a joint memo signed by the parties and their respective advocates. 3. Contents of the joint memo are read out to the power of attorney holder of the appellants and respondent No.2, they agreed that the terms of the compromise petition depict true terms of settlement and there is no force, undue influence or coercion in reaching out the terms of the settlement. 4. As such, there is no impediment for this Court to place the joint memo on record and dispose of the appeal. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010351622024 NC: 2026:KHC:37381 RSA No. 999 of 2024 5. Accordingly, the following: ORDER (i) Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. (ii) Office is directed to pass modified decree in terms of the compromise petition appending the copy of the joint memo along with sketch as part of the decree. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 86