Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 310 (UTT)

SANTOSH GUJJAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/68/2026 · 2026-02-13

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BA1 No. 68 of 2026 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned D.A.G. for the State. 3. This first bail application has been moved by the applicant seeking regular bail in Case Crime/F.I.R. No. 05 of 2025, under Sections 61(2), 308(5), 318(4) of BNS and 66(D) of I.T. Act, registered at Police Station Lamgada, District Almora. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that all the co-accused, having similar role, have already been enlarged on bail by this Court. Learned counsel further submits that it is a case of parity and in case, the applicant is granted bail, he will not misuse the same and will furnish the bail surety as per the satisfaction of this Court. 5. Learned State Counsel admits the fact that all the co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by this Court. 6. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties and also considering the fact that all the co-accused have already been granted bail by this Court, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail at this stage. 7. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of like amount, to the satisfaction of Court concerned. (Alok Mahra J.) 13.02.2026 Ujjwal