Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 310 (KAR)

MRS SREEJA V v. MR ADV AJAY J N

RP/329/2019 · 2026-02-24

Anu Sivaraman, H T Narendra Prasad

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11548-DB RP No. 329 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REVIEW PETITION NO. 329 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. MRS. SREEJA V AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS WIFE OF RAJESH PULIYANKALATH HARISREE, THENKURISSI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, KERALA 678671 EMAIL ID:vsreeja@ymail.com …PETITIONER BY SMT. SREEJA.V, PARTY-IN-PERSON (ABSENT)] AND: 1. MR. ADV AJAY J N PRAGATI LAW CHAMBERS, 5/A, BHARAT APARTMENTS, #44/1, FAIRFIELD LAYOUT, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 560001. 2. MR. RAJESH PULIYANKALATH Digitally signed by PAVITHRA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11548-DB RP No. 329 of 2019 AGE 49 YEARS SENIOR PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT, GENPACT HEADSTRONG INDIA LTD OFFICIAL ADDRESS: GENPACT HADSTRONG CAPITAL MARKETS, D-4, SECTOR 59, NOIDA-UTTAR PRADESH 201307 HARISREE THNKURISSI PALAKKAD DISTRICT, KERALA 678671 EMAIL ID: rajeshpmenon@gmail.com …RESPONDENTS THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 47 RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW AND RECALL THE ORDER DAETD 25.07.2019 IN CCC 1 OF 2019 (ANNEXURE-A) AND CORRECT THE MISTAKES, OMISSIONS AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11548-DB RP No. 329 of 2019 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) There is no appearance on behalf of the party-in-person, when the matter is called out. 2. The emergent court notice issued on 10.01.2023 to the petitioner by the Court has been returned with the postal shara stating that "the petitioner mentioned in the order is not residing at the given address for the last five years". 3. Further, the second set of papers has not been filed and all other office objections also remain unaddressed. 4. In view of the above, the review petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2