Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:8896 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No.6194 of 2025
-------
Rajnish Kumar Sahu, aged about 35 years, son of Devnandan Sahu, Resident of Vill Kamdara, P.O. & P.S. Kamdara, District Gumla, Jharkhand.
.... Petitioner(s).
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand,
2. The Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, having its office Kali Mandir, Chai Bagan, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.
3. The Chairman, Staff Selection Commission, having its office Kali Mandir, Chai Bagan, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.
4. The Principal Secretary, Education & Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.
5. The Principal Secretary, of Personal Administrative Reforms and Raj Bhasha Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.
… Respondents.
-------
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------ For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Niteshwari Kumari, Advocate For the State
: Ms. Komal Tiwary, AC to AG For the Respondent : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate
------
05/ 25.03.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the respondent-JSSC.
2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that he has not been appointed as Intermediate Trained Teacher (Sahayak Acharya) for Para Teacher Category in spite of the fact that he has obtained more marks than the last selected candidate.
3. During course of argument, it has been admitted by the respondent that the petitioner has obtained 227.707 marks whereas in the category of the petitioner, which is Para Category-EBC the last selected candidate has obtained 157.5657. Thus, it is clear that the petitioner has obtained more marks than the last selected candidate.
4. At this stage, Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, learned counsel for the respondent- JSSC submits that there is some confusion about his graduation from Hindi Vidyapith, Deoghar. The said degree was declared to be null and void.
5. The issue of the degree of Hindi Vidyapith, Deoghar has been set at rest by a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.3115 of 2015, wherein it
has been held that the degrees issued by the Hindi Vidyapith, Deoghar prior to 26.02.2015 is valid.
6. It is the case of the petitioner that the degree of the petitioner from the said Hindi Vidyapith, Deoghar is of the year 2008-09. If that be so, the petitioner cannot be disqualified.
7. Considering the same, I direct the respondents to take a decision, so far as this petitioner is concerned and if it is found that the degree of the petitioner is prior to the cut off date as fixed by a Division of this Court in W.P.(C) No.3115 of 2015, the name of the petitioner will be recommended for the said post, if there is no other legal impediment.
8. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is
disposed of.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 25th March, 2026 Madhav/- Uploaded:30/03/2026
-2-