R/CR.MA/17679/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/08/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE CHARGESHEET) NO. 17679 of 2026 ========================================================== RANJIKANTBHAI RAJUBHAI VASAVA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================== Appearance: MR ZUBIN F BHARDA(159) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS SHRUTI PATHAK, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 12/08/2026 ORDER [1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State. [2.0] The present application is "led under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11199059260214 of 2026 registered with Jhagadia GIDC Police Station, Bharuch for the o1ences under Sections 117(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 54 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. [3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the o1ence. Nothing is required to be recovered or discovered. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of the o1ence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions. [4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application and requested to dismiss the present application for regular bail on the ground that the applicant is very much involved in the present o1ence and considering the gravity of o1ence, no case is made out to entertain present bail application. Therefore, present application does not deserve consideration. R/CR.MA/17679/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/08/2026 [5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the accused in the alleged o1ence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (i) the nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv) character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the State and similar other considerations are required to be considered. [6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects have been considered: (1) Substantial part of investigation as well as remand period is over; (2) Applicant is behind the bar since 29.06.2026; (3) There is nothing to be recovered or discovered from the applicant; (4) It is alleged that an accident took place at a company situated at Jhagadia GIDC, wherein one employee/worker lost his life and others sustained injuries. However, no o1ence was reported by the Company, and the applicant allegedly went to the Company to negotiate with the owner of the Company along with the family members of the deceased/injured persons. At that time, the Security Guard did not allow him to enter the Company premises. Subsequently, he climbed over the wall and trespassed into the premises. In this regard, a complaint for trespass was registered against him, and the police also registered another complaint against R/CR.MA/17679/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/08/2026 him under Section 186 of the BNS. (5) Prosecution has failed to point out the circumstances to continue or prolong his incarceration; (6) Obviously commencement and conclusion of trial will take its own time. (7) case is triable by the JMFC; (8) The applicant has eight past criminal antecedents. In one o1ence of a similar nature, he has been acquitted by this Court. However, the accused is entitled to the presumption of innocence unless and until proven guilty. (9) Considering the personal liberty, the present application deserves consideration; [7.0] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as in the case of Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in (1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of trial will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but amounts to pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is exception” as well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, present application deserves consideration. [8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a "t case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11199059260214 of 2026 registered with Jhagadia GIDC Police Station, Bharuch, on executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-"ve R/CR.MA/17679/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/08/2026 Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he/she shall; (a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; (b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police; (c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week; (d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned; (e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in every month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.; (f) furnish the Aadhaar card, email ID/present address of his residence to the Investigating OIcer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence/contact number without prior permission of Trial Court; (g) not to indulge in any illegal activity failing which learned trial Court shall issue warrant and cancel the bail of the applicant. (h) not to enter into area of Jhagadia Police Station, Bharuch GIDC and Dholgam Village till the charge-sheet is 8led except for marking presence before the concerned police station and/or for attending Court proceedings; [9.0] The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other o1ence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. [10.0] Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify R/CR.MA/17679/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/08/2026 and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. [11.0] At the trial, the trial Court shall not be inJuenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. [12.0] Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted. (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J) KUMAR ALOK12 pt Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: ALOK KUMAR(HC01091), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 12/08/2026 18:09:43