Item 12 29.07.2026 Court. No. 11 Cp Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri MAT/67/2026 IA NO: CAN/1/2026 in WPA/1026/2026 SASTI GHOSH AND ORS VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS Mr. Sudipto Kr. Mazumdar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pintu Ghosh Mr. Alok Dhara Mr. Mayank Bhandari ….for the appellants. Mr. Kunaljit Bhattacharjee Mr. Alok Sah ….for the State. Mr. Satyam Sarkar …..for the respondent no. 9. Mr. Suresh Kumar Mitruka Mr. Charu Bansal Mr. Sujit Swami Ms. Shruti Yadav …..for the respondent nos. 5 & 6. 1. Mr. Mazumdar, learned senior advocate for the appellants, submits that nothing remains to be decided in the appeal as the appellants have already approached the learned trial judge by filing an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2 2. Learned advocate for the respondent no.9 submits that the writ petition itself was not maintainable. 3. Learned advocate for the respondent nos. 5 and 6, submits that the fact that the appellants have approached the learned trial judge was not mentioned before the learned writ court. 4. Be that as it may, we are of the view that the appellants’ remedy is before the learned civil court. 5. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of. The learned civil court is requested to expedite the hearing of the suit and connected applications. 6. Accordingly, the appeal and the connected application are disposed of, upon upholding the order impugned. 7. Parties are directed to act on the basis of the server copy of this order. (Shampa Sarkar, J.) (Smita Das De, J.)