KUM. PALLAVI. N v. SMT. KAVITHA S. MANNIKERI (IAS)
CCC/1408/2024 · 2026-07-23
Anu Sivaraman, Venkatesh Naik T
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30982 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30982 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010750852024 NC: 2026:KHC:38169-DB CCC No. 1408 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1408 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
KUM. PALLAVI. N D/O SRI NAGARAJ K V AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT NO. 252/114 9TH MAIN ROAD 4TH BLOCK NANDINI LAYOUT BENGALURU 560 096
…COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. AJIT KALYAN, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SMT. KAVITHA S. MANNIKERI (IAS) THE COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD KAVERI BHAVAN KG ROAD, BENGALURU 560 009 …ACCUSED
Digitally signed by PAVITHRA N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010750852024 NC: 2026:KHC:38169-DB CCC No. 1408 of 2024
2.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING VIKAS SOUDHA BENGALURU 560 001
…PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. H L PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR A1;
SRI. RAHUL CARIAPPA K.S., AGA FOR PROFORMA R2)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO PUNISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW FOR SHOWING DISOBEDIENCE TO THE ORDERS PASSED IN WP NO.13952/2024 (LB-RES) DATED 28.08.2024 PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY ISSUING ENDORSEMENT DATED 28.10.2024 PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE-B BY THE ACCUSED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010750852024 NC: 2026:KHC:38169-DB CCC No. 1408 of 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the complainant as well as the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1/accused No.1 and the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent No.2- State.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for accused No.1 that, pursuant to the direction issued by the learned Single Judge for consideration of the claim of the complainant for allotment of a site, the representation of the complainant dated 16.02.2024 has been considered and an endorsement dated 28.10.2024 has been issued to the complainant.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the complainant that the reason for rejection is identical to what was earlier stated in the objection raised before the learned Single Judge.
4. Having considered the contentions advanced, we notice that W.A.No.165/2023 filed against the Order dated
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010750852024 NC: 2026:KHC:38169-DB CCC No. 1408 of 2024
10.06.2022 of the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.7564/2022 was dismissed on 02.03.2023 making it clear that, the dismissal of the writ appeal will not be a precedent.
5. In the above view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the correctness or otherwise of the endorsement cannot be considered in these proceedings. The Contempt of Court Case is accordingly closed, leaving open the contentions of the parties and the right of the complainant to challenge the endorsement, if so advised.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
PN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 34