Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30979 (PNJ)

SHIVA TIMBER TRADERS v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

CWP/17821/2026 · 2026-07-09

Rohit Kapoor, To Be Nominated

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

173 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Shiva Timber Traders Union of India and others CORAM: HON’BLE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Govind Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naman Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel for the ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. 1. S appealable and the petitioner has not availed of the said statutory remedy, we are not inclined to entertain 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy of appeal, if so advised, in accordance with law. 3. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand 09.07.2026 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17821 Date of Decision: 09.07.2026 Shiva Timber Traders Vs. Union of India and others HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Govind Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naman Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel for the respondents – UOI. *** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) Since the order impugned in the present writ petition is appealable and the petitioner has not availed of the said statutory remedy, we are not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy of appeal, if so advised, in accordance All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 17821-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.07.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Govind Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naman Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel (Oral) nce the order impugned in the present writ petition is appealable and the petitioner has not availed of the said statutory remedy, we the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy of appeal, if so advised, in accordance All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No nce the order impugned in the present writ petition is appealable and the petitioner has not availed of the said statutory remedy, we Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy of appeal, if so advised, in accordance RAJESH KUMAR 2026.07.14 12:08 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.