IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9212 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-398 Year-2025 Thana- KAKO District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Deonandan Prasad Yadav Son of Late Nageshwar Yadav Resident Of Village- Dakshni, Ps- Kako (Bhelawar), Dist- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 22-04-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kako (Bhalawar) P.S. Case No.398 of 2025, F.I.R dated 29.10.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109(1), 303(2), 74, 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. According to prosecution case, on 27.10.2025, at around 1:00 AM, Sanjoga Devi was arranging straw near her house when several accused persons abused her. On the instruction of one accused, two others brought lathis and assaulted her and her sons, causing injuries. During the incident, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9212 of 2026(3) dt.22-04-2026 2/4 two accused allegedly snatched her gold ornaments. She and her sons were taken to a hospital and later referred to Jehanabad Sadar Hospital, where she received multiple stitches on her head. It is further alleged that the accused misbehaved with her and threatened her with serious consequences if she reported the matter to the Police. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an order giver and the allegation of overt act or assault is against Lalbabu, who has already been extended the privilege of anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No.8725 of 2026 and the injuries sustained by the informant have also been found to be simple in nature. 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that the petitioner is an order giver and the main assailant, namely, Lalbabu, has already been extended the privilege of anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No.8725 of 2026 and the injuries sustained by the informant have also been found to be simple in nature. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9212 of 2026(3) dt.22-04-2026 3/4 grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in connection with Kako (Bhalawar) P.S. Case No.398 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other following conditions:- (i) one of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document/personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself; (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9212 of 2026(3) dt.22-04-2026 4/4 cancellation of the bail bonds; (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. sharun/- (Ajit Kumar, J) U T