Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30959 (MAD)

Dikson Raj @ Dikson v. The State Represented by the Inspector of Police

CRL OP/14483/2026 · 2026-06-09

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 14483 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 14483 of 2026 Dikson Raj @ Dikson ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Represented by The Inspector of Police T-11, Thiruninravur Police Station, Thiruvallur District (crime No.121 of 2026) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner /accused herein on bail in crime No.121 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): M/S. M.Gnanasekar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Government Advocate (Criminal side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 31.03.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 189 (4), 125, 61 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, r/w 25 (1A) Arms Act, 1959 and 4, 5 of Explosive Substance Act, in Crime No.121 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been in custody since 31.03.2026. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14483 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 and ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police drew the attention of this Court to the orders dated 08.06.2026 in Crl.O.P.Nos.13508, 13518, 13602 and 13618 of 2026, wherein this Court dismissed the bail applications of the other co-accused (A3, A4, A6, A11 & A14). He further submitted that the same parity must be applied to the petitioner. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 4.Considering the serious allegations against the petitioner and the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), this Court is of the firm view that, the petitioner is not entitled for bail at this stage. Consequently, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 09-06-2026 ep https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14483 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1.The Inspector of Police T-11, Thiruninravur Police Station, Thiruvallur District 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14483 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. EP CRL OP No. 14483 of 2026 09-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis