1 CGHC010019222026 2026:CGHC:35929 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 672 of 2026 Dr. Eeshwari Prasad Chelak S/o Late Shri Manmohan Lal Chelak Aged About 42 Years Posted As Assistant Professor (Botany) In The College Of The Government Mahaprabhu Vallabhacharya P.G. College Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund, R/o Near The Pani Tanki, Bazar Chowk Mandir Hasoud, Post Office And P.S. Mandir Hasoud, Tahsil Arang, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Pin 492101, Mb 7489861374. Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Higher Education Department, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Tahsil And Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492002. 2 - Commissioners Officer Incharge In The Commissioner Of The Higher Education Department, Block 3, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Tahsil And Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Pin 492002. 3 - The Principal Of The Government Mahaprabhu Vallabhacharya P.G. College Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh, Pin 493445. 4 - Principal Accountant General Of The Chhattisgarh In The Office Of The Accountant General Of The Chhattisgarh, Accounts And Entitlement, Zero Point Balodabazar Road Raipur, Tahsil And Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492005. Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Tejaswi Mandavi, Advocate For Resp/State : Mr. Sahil Singh, PL For Resp. No.4 : Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2026.08.14 10:46:16 +0530 2 (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 13/08/2026 1. The petitioner has called in question the order dated 19.07.2024 passed by respondent No.2 as well as the consequential recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner pursuant thereto. 2. The controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the common order dated 30.07.2026 passed by this Court in WPS No.6505/2024 and connected matters, whereby the challenge to the corrigendum dated 25.06.2024 and the consequential action for refixation of pay and recovery of excess payment has already been considered and rejected. 3. In view of the aforesaid judgment, no separate consideration is required in the present writ petition. The petitioner has failed to establish any enforceable right to claim three advance increments contrary to the governing statutory framework. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed in terms of the common order dated 30.07.2026 passed in WPS No.6505/2024 and connected matters. 5. Consequently, any interim order operating in favour of the petitioner shall stand vacated. Sd/- Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul