Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010283022025
2026:GAU-AS:3283
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4/2026 SHIBAYAN KAR S/O.- SUBRATA KUMAR KAR, R/O.- RAMAKRISHNA MISSION ROAD, HOUSE NO. 21, P.O. AND P.S. SRIBHUMI, DIST- SRIBHUMI, ASSAM, PIN-
788710. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, HIGHER EDUCATION (TECHNICAL DEPARTMENT) DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6.
3:THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19.
4:THE PRINCIPAL KARIMGANJ POLYTECHNIC MAIZGRAM KARIMGANJ DISTRICT- SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN- 788712.
5:THE TREASURY OFFICER
Page No.# 2/3 SRIBHUMI DISTRICT SRIBHUMI Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D BARUAH, MR. P K BORDOLOI,MS. P HANDIQUE Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU, SC, FINANCE Linked Case : WP(C)/6090/2025 SRI SHYAMAL KRISHNA ROY S/O SRI UTTAM KUMAR ROY R/O S.P. ROAD SRIBHUMI P.O. AND P.S. SRIBHUMI (SADAR) DISTRICT SRIBHUMI PIN-788713 2: SMTI KOHENOOR BARBHUIYA D/O TAJ UDDIN BARBHUIYA R/O HOUSE NO. 278 MEHRAB ALI LANE CHAMRAGUDAM SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM-788001 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM HIGHER EDUCATION (TECHNICAL) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6.
3:THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI - 19 4:THE PRINCIPAL KARIMGANJ POLYTECHNIC
Page No.# 3/3 MAIZGRAM KARIMGANJ DISTRICT-SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN 788712 5:THE TREASURY OFFICER SRIBHUMI DISTRICT SRIBHUMI ------------ Advocate for : MR. D BARUAH Advocate for : SC. EDU. appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO O R D E R 06.03.2026 Mr. D. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners have been paid their salary and therefore both the writ petitions have become infructuous. Mr. D. Upamanyu, learned Standing Counsel, Higher Education Department agrees to the submission. In view of above, both the writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant