Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30913 (CHH)

BASANT KUMAR JAISWAL v. PUSHKAR KUMAR MADHUKAR

MAC/346/2020 · 2026-08-18

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010033962020 2026:CGHC:37175 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 346 of 2020 Basant Kumar Jaiswal, S/o Jokhan Ram, Aged about 55 years, R/o S.E.C.L. G.S. Colony, Baikunthpur, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh. (Claimant) ... Appellant versus 1. Pushkar Kumar Madhukar, S/o Madan Lal Madhukar, Aged about 24 years, R/o Rani Goanv Singri, Naharpara, Police Station Ratanpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Non-Applicant No.1) 2. Vasudev Parvani, S/o Lt. Chela Ram, R/o Ward No.5, Sindhi Colony, Jarhabhata, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Non-Applicant No.2) 3. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., C.B.O. Korba, Commercial Complex, T.P. Nagar, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. (Non-Applicant No.3) ... Respondents For Appellant : None present. For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Animesh Verma, Advocate. For Respondent No.3 : Ms. Suchi Ramteke, Advocate. Single Bench:- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 19/08/2026 1. When the matter is called for hearing in two rounds, none present for the appellant to prosecute the appeal. No representation is made. SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2026.08.19 18:26:31 +0530 2 2. In absence of representation on behalf of the appellant, the Court has no option except to dismiss the appeal. 3. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma