1 CGHC010369702025 2026:CGHC:37544-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2767 of 2025 1. Vividh Singh S/o Shri Bihari Singh Aged About 38 Years R/o R.E.S. Colony, Chhindgarh, District Sukhma Chhattisgarh 2. Pradeep Baghel S/o Shri Khikram Baghel Aged About 35 Years R/o R.E.S. Colony, Chhindgarh, District Sukhma Chhattisgarh 3. Kamlesh Chandrakar S/o Shri Ashwani Kumar Chandrakar Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Bhaisbod, Ward No. 14, Tehsil Patan, District Durg Chhattisgarh 4. Rajkishore Tigga S/o Late Mangal Sai Tigga Aged About 35 Years R/o House No. 170/1, Kindo Gali, Near Shanti Bhavan, Patpariya, Ambikapur, District Sarguja Chhattisgarh 5. Aditya Chandrakar S/o Shri K.K. Chandrakar Aged About 36 Years R/o Rudri, Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Superintendent of Police, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Station House Officer Police Station Civil Lines, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. Bhartendu Kumar Kamal S/o Ganeshram Kamal R/o Quarter No. M.I.G. 2, Pushp Vihar Colony, Bhrss Nagar, Dadar Road, Korba Chhattisgarh ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.08.24 11:34:35 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Chandradeep Prasad, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Government Advocate. For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Anmol Gupta, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Vaishali Jaswani, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 21.08.2026 1. Heard Mr. Chandradeep Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents No. 1 & 2 and Mr. Anmol Gupta, learned counsel holding the brief of Ms. Vaishali Jaswani, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 3. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer: “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the records, if necessary, admit the petition and after hearing parties in the matter allow the present petition and quash the FIR bearing No. 225 of 2022 dated 16.04.2022 registered at P.S. Civil Lines, District Raipur under Sections 420 and 468 of the IPC so far as it relates to the petitioners herein and to grant any other relief which the petitioners are entitled to.” 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, in the present case, the charge-sheet has already been filed before the learned trial Court. Since the present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the FIR, he prays that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioners to avail such other remedy as may be available to them in accordance with law. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioners to avail such remedy as may be available to them in accordance with law before the appropriate forum. 6. Certified copies of the FIR and other documents, if any, filed by the petitioners, be returned to them after retaining photocopies thereof on record. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan