Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30904 (KAR)

SRI CHINNARAJU v. SRI RAJASHEKAR

RSA/870/2018 · 2026-07-22

V Srishananda

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010059052018 NC: 2026:KHC:38360 RSA No. 870 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 870 OF 2018 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: SRI. CHINNARAJU S/O NARSHIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS KANAKAPURA ROAD, DODDKALSANDRA VILLAGE, BANGALORE - 560 062. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. VAIJAYANTHIMALA B, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. RAJASHEKAR S/O LATE PUTTABASAPPA AGED ABUT 51 YEARS, HOUSE NO.19, 12TH MAIN 11TH CROSS, K.S. TOWN KENGERI, BANGALORE - 60. 2. SRI. H.M. VENKATESH S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, HANUMANTHANAGAR MANCHANAYAKANAHALLI DAKALE, BIDADI HOBLI Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010059052018 NC: 2026:KHC:38360 RSA No. 870 of 2018 3. V.H. RAMESH S/O LATE HOMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, VAJARAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK & DISTRICT. 4. U. SUBHODA SHETTY S/O LATE GANAPATHI SHETTY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT HOUSE NO.8, HOSPITAL COLONY BIDADI VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK & DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (R2 - SERVED; VIDE ORDER DATED 09.06.2026, NOTICE TO R3 HELD SUFFICIENT; VIDE ORDER DATED 15.06.2026, APPEAL AGAINST R1 AND R4 STANDS DISMISSED) THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 06.01.2018 PASSED IN R.A.NO. 25/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE RAMANAGARA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 07.03.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.409/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIAPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM., RAMANAGARAM. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010059052018 NC: 2026:KHC:38360 RSA No. 870 of 2018 ORAL JUDGMENT Notice issued to the appellant is received by the daughter as per the process staff report from City Civil Court, Bangalore. Appellant called out. Absent. Appellant has not chosen to engage any other advocate. As such, left with no alternate, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4