Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010455892026 NC: 2026:KHC:37719 WP No. 20622 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 20622 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
RAMAMURTHI M S, S/O SONNAPPA C M, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO. 50 MALLUR VILLAGE, JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI, SIDLAGATTA TALUK-562 105.
CHIKABALLAPUR DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGESH M.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M S BUILDINGS, VIDHANAVEEDHI BENGALURU-01.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT, CHIKKABALLAPURA -562 101.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CHIKKABALLAPUR SIN DIVISION, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562 101.
4.
THE TAHASILDAR, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT -562 105.
5.
SONAPPA C M,
Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010455892026 NC: 2026:KHC:37719 WP No. 20622 of 2026
S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, R/AT NO. 50, MALLUR VILLAGE, JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI, SIDLAGATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT-562 105.
6.
SMT. NARAYANAMMA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT MALUR VILLAGE, JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI, SIDLAGATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT-562 105. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SPOORTHY HEGDE N.,HCGP FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FIELD UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CRETORARI OR OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 19.07.2024 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPURA IN R.A.(SIDL)822/2023-24 AT ANNEXURE-F AND ORDER DATED 15.06.2026 PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPURA IN R.P.NO.0113/2024 AT ANNEXURE-G.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Learned HCGP accepts notice for respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010455892026 NC: 2026:KHC:37719 WP No. 20622 of 2026
2. The petitioner is assailing the order dated 19.07.2024 passed by the respondent No.3 (Annexure-F) and the order dated 15.06.2026 passed by respondent No.2 (Annexure-G).
3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the impugned
order passed by the respondent – Authorities, it would indicate that, there is a dispute in the family of the petitioner and respondent Nos. 5 and 6, in O.S.No.342/2022, wherein the sisters of the petitioner herein have filed a suit seeking relief of partition and separate possession in respect of the subject land.
4. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that the petitioner be permitted to approach the competent authority after the conclusion of the suit in O.S.No.342/2022. Further, as the mutation has been made in terms of the registered sale dated 16.07.1980, no interference is called for in this petition.
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010455892026 NC: 2026:KHC:37719 WP No. 20622 of 2026
5. Accordingly, petition is rejected.
Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
CM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21