Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30889 (MAD)

SHARMA ANITA DEVI PROPRIETOR OF SLS ENTERPRISES v. THE RECOVERY OFFICER/ DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) NORTH II

WP/19224/2026 · 2026-06-08

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 19224 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 19224 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.20501 & 20504 of 2026 Sharma Anita Devi, Proprietor of SLS Enterprises, 7/1B, T H Road, New Washermenpet, Chennai 600 081. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Recovery Officer/ Deputy Commissioner (ST) North II, Room No.510, 5th Floor, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building, No.32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Chennai – 600003. 2. The Deputy State Tax Officer I, TONDIARPET ASSESSMENT CIRCLE, INTEGRATED COMMERCIAL TAXES BUILDING, 2nd floor, ELEPHANT GATE BRIDGE ROAD, CHENNAI 600 003. ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records culminating Order reference No. ZD330324073574G dated 13.03.2024 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same as per se illegal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19224 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner: Mr. S.Ravichandran For Respondents: Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Counsel (Tax) ORDER An order dated 13.03.2024 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice. 2. Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of both the respondents. 3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 50% of the disputed tax demand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle. 4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 50% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 50% of the disputed tax demand. In view of the impugned order being set aside, the attachment, if any, of the bank account of the petitioner shall stand raised. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19224 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 08-06-2026 Index : Yes/No (2/2) Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ To 1. The Recovery Officer/ Deputy Commissioner (ST) North II, Room No.510, 5th Floor, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building, No.32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Chennai – 600003. 2.The Deputy State Tax Officer I, TONDIARPET ASSESSMENT CIRCLE, INTEGRATED COMMERCIAL TAXES BUILDING, 2nd floor, ELEPHANT GATE BRIDGE ROAD, CHENNAI 600 003. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19224 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 19224 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.20501 & 20504 of 2026 08-06-2026 (2/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis