1 CGHC010320762026 2026:CGHC:37340 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6271 of 2026 Paras Yadav S/o Shri Ganesh Ram Yadav Aged About 54 Years Presently Posted As Teacher At Govt. Middle School Umarada, Block- Kurud, District- Dhamtari, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G. 2. Department Of Public Instruction Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G. 3. Joint Director Education Department, Division Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G. 4. District Education Officer Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, C.G. 5. Block Education Officer Block Kurud, District- Dhamtari, C.G. 6. Hariram Sahu S/o Narottam Sahu Aged About 55 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary School Bastipara Khisor, Block Magarlod, District- Dhamtari. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 20/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has challenged the impugned transfer order dated 06.08.2026 (Annexure P/1), whereby he has been transferred from Government Middle School, Umarada, Block Kurud, District JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.08.21 10:58:06 +0530 2 Dhamtari to Gariyaband. It is submitted that the petitioner's father, aged about 80 years, is bedridden due to paralysis since 2015, while his 75-year-old mother is wholly dependent upon the petitioner. He further submits that the transfer order is arbitrary and contrary to the transfer policy. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to submit a representation before the Committee constituted under Clause 8 of the Transfer Policy and prays that the same may be considered and decided in accordance with law. 2. Learned State counsel submits that, in case the petitioner submits a representation before the competent Transfer Committee constituted under Clause 8 of the State Transfer Policy, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 4. Considering the nature of the grievance raised by the petitioner and the submission made by learned State counsel, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petitioner is directed to submit a fresh representation before the competent Transfer Committee constituted under Clause 8 of the State Transfer Policy within a period of 10 days from today. In case such representation is submitted within the aforesaid period, the competent Transfer Committee shall consider and decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order, strictly in accordance with law and the applicable Transfer Policy, preferably 3 within a period of 25 days thereafter, till then the effect and operation of the impugned transfer order dated 06.08.2026 shall remain stayed. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti