Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3087 (KAR)

MR. RAMESH KUMAR Y v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/1187/2019 · 2026-04-15

R Nataraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20374 CRL.P No. 1187 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1187 OF 2019 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. MR. RAMESH KUMAR Y S/O YELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS IGGALURU VILLAGE ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT-562 107. 2. SMT. SWATHI W/O RAMESH KUMAR IGGALURU VILLAGE ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT-562 107. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAVI L. VAIDYA, ADVOCATE (THROUGH V/C)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HEBBAGODI POLICE STATION BANGALORE-560 099 REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. MRS. PREMA W/O JAYARAMAREDDY AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS NO.33, AMBALIPURA VILLAGE VARTUR HOBLI, SARJAPURA ROAD ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT-560 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJATH SUBRAMANYAM, HCGP) Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20374 CRL.P No. 1187 of 2019 THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING THAT TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS INITIATED AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 FOR AN OFFENCE P/U/S.120B, 420, 468 AND 471 OF IPC, PENDING (THEN BEFORE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (Jr.Dn.) AND JMFC COURT ANEKAL) AT PRESENT PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANEKAL, IN C.C.NO.391/2015 (CRIME NO.818/2013 OF 1ST RESPONDENT POLICE STATION) VIDE AT ANNEXURE-B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks time on the ground that the petitioners have taken back the file. This Court had granted time on the last date, subject to the condition that the petitioners pay costs of Rs.2,000/-. 2. Therefore, the request for adjournment, is not justified. Hence, this petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE BKN/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3