SUKHWINDER SINGH ALIAS BAGGU MASTER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/7296/2026 · 2026-07-17
Virinder Aggarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30857 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30857 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-7296-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (219) CRM-M-7296-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-17.07.2026 SUKHWINDER SINGH @ BAGGU MASTER … Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Manpreet Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gurpartap Singh, AAG Punjab. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J . (Oral)
1. This criminal writ petition has been moved under Section 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner by providing police protection as threaten by respondents No.4 to 9.
2. Status report by way of an affidavit of Mr. Gursewak Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Jalalabad has been filed by learned State counsel, which is taken on record.
3. As per the status report, petitioner has joined the inquiry. Statement was recorded and as per the findings, there is no threat perception to the petitioner. There was a minor altercation which was mutually settled between the parties. In view of this report, petitioner has no threat perception.
4. Accordingly, the instant petition stands disposed of. POONAM 2026.07.17 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-7296-2026 (O&M) 2
5. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of.
(VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 17th July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.17 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document