Akash Yadav @ Julum Yadav @ Sukhraj Yadav @ Sukhram Yadav v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./1652/2026 · 2026-01-19
R P Mishra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30854 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30854 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1652 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2025 Thana- BIND District- Nalanda ====================================================== Akash Yadav @ Julum Yadav @ Sukhraj Yadav @ Sukhram Yadav son of Rajesh yadav @ Bindeshwar yadav Resident of village- Chatarpur, Ps- Bind, Dist- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramesh Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 19-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bind PS Case No. 107 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(i)of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 132 liters of country made liquor was recovered from two motorcycles. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not concerned with the said motorcycles and has been implicated in this case on the disclosure made by the apprehended co-accused person. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1652 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026 2/2 petitioner is in custody since 07.12.2025 and has got three criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the BNSS,
2023. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bind PS Case No. 107 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial.
In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. Siddharth Soni/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T