28/07/2026 D/L – 295 Court No.35 S. Kundu Allowed C.R.M.(M) 1572 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Domkal P.S Case No. 83 of 2024 dated 03/02/2024 under Sections 498A/326/307/302/34/120B of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. In the matter of: Tohur Sk @ Tahiruddin Sekh …Petitioner. Mr. Arnab Chatterjee Mr. Avik Ghosh …for the petitioner. Mr. Koustav Lal Mukherjee …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for two years two months. The petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased. Presently, 16 witnesses have already been examined and the prosecution intends to 26 witnesses. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and refers to the materials appearing in the case diary along with the bail application. Evidences of the witnesses have been enclosed. I have taken into account the evidence of P.W 1/complainant and I am of the view that without entering into the merits of the case, considering the present period of detention and the time which would be consumed to take the trial to its logical conclusion further detention of the petitioner is unwarranted. 2 As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Berhampore, Murshidabad. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District Murshidabd without the prior permission of the learned Court. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1572 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence filed by the State is taken on record. All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)