CRM-M-35692-2026(O&M) & Anr. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 154 CRM-M-35692-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 14.07.2026 Narender Singh and others … Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another … Respondents 160 CRM-M-37858-2026(O&M) Paramjeet and others … Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Ankur Dua, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Malvika DAG, Haryana. *** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 528 of BNSS,2023 (erstwhile Section 482 of Cr.P.C.) for quashing of FIR No. 204, dated 11.05.2022, under Sections 120-B, 406, 420 of IPC (467 & 468 IPC added lateron) [corresponding Sections 61(2), 316(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) of BNS, 2023], registered at Police Station IMT, District Rohtak (Annexure P-1), and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of the compromise dated 20.05.2026 (Annexure P-7), effected between the parties. 2. Initially, CRM-M-35692-2026 was filed on behalf of five accused persons seeking quashing of the FIR on the basis of a compromise. Vide order dated 07.07.2026, this Court noticed that the FIR named a total RAJAN 2026.07.16 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-35692-2026(O&M) & Anr. 2 of eight accused and that the remaining three accused had neither filed any petition for quashing nor had they been impleaded as parties to the said petition. Accordingly, the matter was adjourned to today. 3. Today, CRM-M-37858-2026, filed on behalf of the remaining three accused on the basis of the same compromise, has also been listed along with the earlier petition. 4. Upon a query raised by the Court, learned counsel fairly states that, apart from the complainant, the FIR also discloses two other victims, namely, Vinod Kumar and Rajbala, neither of whom has been impleaded as a party in either of the two petitions. 5. Faced with the aforesaid position, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw both the petitions with liberty to file a fresh petition by placing on record the complete factual matrix and impleading all the necessary parties, including all the accused as well as all the victims, including the complainant. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of the connected case. ( Sanjay Vashisth ) Judge 14.07.2026 Rajan Whether speaking / reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RAJAN 2026.07.16 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document