109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Cms-2558-59-LPA-2026 IN/AND LPA-1042-2026 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 14.07.2026 SUMAN LATA ......APPELLANT Vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .........RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Raghubir Tejpal & Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocates, for the appellant. Ms. Anu Pal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. ***** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J.(ORAL) 1. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the applications seeking condonation of delay of 15 days in re-filing and 61 days in filing the appeal, as well as the main appeal, may kindly be disposed of as not pressed, with liberty to avail of the appropriate remedy for claiming the salary from the Contractor before the appropriate forum. 2. Ordered accordingly. 3. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE JULY 14, 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) nitin JUDGE Whether Speaking Yes Whether Reportable No NITIN 2026.07.15 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document